Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please add requests for MILHIST participation to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Requests for project input. This includes requests for comment, requested moves, articles for deletion, and more.
Main pageDiscussionNews &
open tasks
AcademyAssessmentA-Class
review
ContestAwardsMembers

    Requests for project input

    [edit]


    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Italian Ethiopia#Requested move 27 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:01, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Good article reassessment for Wings (1927 film)

    [edit]

    Wings (1927 film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Good article reassessment for 102nd Intelligence Wing

    [edit]

    102nd Intelligence Wing has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Good article reassessment for Arthur Phillip

    [edit]

    Arthur Phillip has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:13, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    What the result should be in the infobox as a reflection of the body of the article. Cinderella157 (talk) 01:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Request for input Talk:List of Norfolk airfields

    [edit]

    Talk:List of Norfolk airfields has an ongoing discussion regarding the scope of this and potentially other equivalent lists, regarding the inclusion of civilian airfields to a mainly military list. List of former Royal Air Force stations already has a table that can be sorted by county. Also if the list could be replaced by a templates similar to "Template:RAF stations in Lincolnshire" Gavbadger (talk) 20:08, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Notice

    The article Marlin-class submarine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

    Could not find reliable sources to establish notability.

    While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

    You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

    Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Esw01407 (talk) 00:45, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    If there are reliable sources about this submarine design, some data could be upmerged to the the designer article, DCNS. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Good article reassessment for 1st Airborne Division (United Kingdom)

    [edit]

    1st Airborne Division (United Kingdom) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Spanish Christian–Muslim War of 1172–1212#Requested move 9 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. --RobertJohnson35 (talk) 16:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Tel al-Sultan attack#Requested move 1 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Abo Yemen 17:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Sorry I am new to wiki so apologises if this is the wrong place to ask, I requested peer review following some changes I made to the linked article. LeChatiliers Pupper (talk) 18:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Houthi movement#Requested move 12 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Abo Yemen 18:56, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Discussion on the infobox result and territorial changes of the Granada War

    [edit]

    There is an ongoing discussion on Talk:Granada War about the result and territorial changes on the infobox of the article. Feel free to participate. --RobertJohnson35 (talk) 16:41, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Operation Barbarossa § Proposed lead improvements, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. — Goszei (talk) 07:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Chyah airstrike#Requested move 6 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 15:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Behind Enemy Lines (1986 film)#Requested move 19 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 19:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Pacific War § Proposed lead improvements, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. — Goszei (talk) 23:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Comments

    [edit]

    There are comments at Talk:Al-Faddayn that might be of interest to editors here. -- Otr500 (talk) 11:12, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Comments on Notes section

    [edit]
    There are comments at Talk:Fourth Fitna, that may be of interest to editors, especially any on the Middle East, Medieval, or Early Muslim task forces. -- Otr500 (talk) 12:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Colt's Manufacturing Company#Requested move 13 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 15:01, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:List of towns and villages depopulated during the 1947–1949 Palestine war#Requested move 15 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 19:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Good article reassessment for 8th Military Police Brigade (United States)

    [edit]

    8th Military Police Brigade (United States) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Notice

    The article Projekt TYTAN has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

    Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No reliable sources online Google. Not enough information to merge.

    While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

    You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

    Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 02:24, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Ecgberht, King of Wessex#Requested move 28 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 03:48, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Russian invasion of Ukraine has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. FOARP (talk) 17:00, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Good article reassessment for Supermarine Spitfire

    [edit]

    Supermarine Spitfire has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Angolan Civil War

    [edit]

    Hi all. Recently the infobox to Angolan Civil War has been amended to include a long list of the various nationalities that served as foreign mercenaries or volunteers during that conflict. This results in the respective nations essentially being listed under the "combatants" heading of the infobox. I think this is highly unusual, and most of the other conflict-related articles I've read or revised do not have this feature, even those in which foreign fighters took part, whether as mercenaries or otherwise. As is it seems to make the infobox rather bloated, and I'm in favor of restricting the use of the "combatants" section solely to national governments which participated directly in hostilities. Thoughts? Katangais (talk) 00:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Agreed. "From that country" =/= "That country was a combatant". - The Bushranger One ping only 00:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @SpinnerLaserzthe2nd:: Please explain why the listing of different nationalities of mercenaries is necessary in the combatants section of the infobox. I've yet to see this in any other conflict-related article, so I'm genuinely puzzled at its inclusion at Angolan Civil War. --Katangais (talk) 05:18, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Look at the Iran–Iraq War article for example. You can see under volunteers. We could either:
    Iran–Iraq War lists general foreign fighters as combatants (ie "Shia volunteers" and "Arab volunteers"). The equivalent would be adding "foreign mercenaries" to the combatants list for Angolan Civil War. There's no need to list the individual nationalities of all the mercenaries as separate combatants in the infobox, especially alongside state actors. --Katangais (talk) 07:45, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    We could still list the indiviual nationalities under "units involved" section. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 10:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Nationalities are not units. That’s the type of information that would be useful in the body of the article, but too granular for the infobox. --Katangais (talk) 17:29, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Mercenaries do not represent their country of origin and should not be presented in a way that suggests they do. They are not state players or a faction in a civil war so they do not belong under "belligerents" in the infobox. They are not a "unit" unless they are organised into a specific unit. Per MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE, the infobox is not the place for nuance or detail. An extensive list of units would be inappropriate. WP:OTHERCONTENT arguments have no substance unless the other stuff represents best practice - ie two wrongs don't make a right. Cinderella157 (talk) 04:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Does anyone know how to fix the table at the above location? It's currently showing zero pages in most non-article categories. Looks to be the result of a recent move of these categories eg from Category:Disambig-Class military history articles to Category:Disambig-Class military history pages - Dumelow (talk) 15:36, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Missing basing topic: weapon range

    [edit]

    Has ru, pl and bg interwikis at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4154317 - but I was surprised to find nothing on en or in most other languages. Seems like a basic and notable military topic. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Possibly covered by articles on such topics as Proving ground, Bombing range and perhaps various types of test and training facilities? Donner60 (talk) 07:35, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Donner60 Related topics, but missing the red linked parent article, no? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:11, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    It could be easier for some readers to find under the weapons range title with links to the other articles for further information. Perhaps a redirect to proving ground might not be comprehensive enough to cover it all. I didn't further scrutinize it, however. Donner60 (talk) 06:01, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Is "Howitzers of similar caliber, role, era, and capability" redudant?

    [edit]

    Many articles (narrowly artillery, but we also do this for aircraft engines) include a list under their 'See also' section for a list of Howitzers of similar caliber, role, era, and capability, i.e. 155mm towed artillery of the '70s. Is this redudant [sic] ?

    I reverted this, prompting a comment here. But then realised that they'd blanked a whole bunch of them too: Special:Contributions/Eurohunter (20 Jan 2025). I would support restoring the lot. It's a useful section for a comparison and pointer to related articles. Very far from "there is no point in doing this."

    Thoughts? @Eurohunter: Andy Dingley (talk) 18:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Me and other people already removed similar redundant lists from articles about tanks. This is just a list of other howitizers unrelated to this one. The whole point of see also is to add links to articles which haven't been mentioned yet in the article, so once they are mentioned in the article you remove them from see also - in this case there are just unrelated articles which will never be described in the text as it has nothing to do unless you have sources for some kind of comparison. Eurohunter (talk) 18:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I think you ought to read WP:SEEALSO, which does not support your argument, Eurohunter. Parsecboy (talk) 18:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Parsecboy: Are you sure? "A "See also" section is a useful way to organize internal links to related or comparable articles and build the web". Eurohunter (talk) 19:44, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    What are other, similar howitzers of the same period if not "comparable articles"? Parsecboy (talk) 20:22, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Parsecboy: How it makes it comparable? There should be direct source which clearly indicate comparison in some way - some kind of professional review, opinion from forces etc. Eurohunter (talk) 22:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Because that's what the the word "comparable" means? There are no sources required to identify articles that meet that basic definition. Parsecboy (talk) 23:40, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Now you're just shifting goalposts in the hope that something will stick. You first claimed that these comparisons were redundant. Now you're claiming they're so significant that they must be easily sourceable. Which is it? Andy Dingley (talk) 00:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, "See also" exists for a reason, and it's not the reason Eurohunter apparently thinks it is. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Andy Dingley: I don't know for what or I'm not sure what do you want to say by "Now you're" - so simpy the answer is both answers are correct. These lists (SPAM) were redundant to these articles, as there was no any criteria to add them - they were just random - why do not add 3, 4 or 15 more yet? There is no reason to cancel edits and they should be restored. If they are comparable then they shoud be mentioned in text with sources - this is far connection to these articles, so if you add them to section see also without any description it's very not clear why they are there. For this reason I didn't removed some see also as there was reason provided why they are there. Eurohunter (talk) 21:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The see also section is expressly for similar or related articles that do not warrant being included in the prose. You need to revert your edits to the affected articles, as they are entirely without merit or basis in policy, procedure, or precedent. Parsecboy (talk) 00:37, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Parsecboy: "The see also section is expressly for similar or related articles that do not warrant being included in the prose" - yes but it's not reason to add whole lists of unrelated articles (SPAM). There is no any description after link. Eurohunter (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Except that they are related based on weapon type, caliber, and function. You would have a case if someone added a 20mm antiaircraft gun to the 155mm howitzer article being discussed, but the weapons in the list presented are all similar in caliber, type, and function. These lists are quite helpful if a reader wants to see what other kinds of howitzers were used during the time period in question. Calling them SPAM is ridiculous. Intothatdarkness 15:51, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Intothatdarkness: There was no any description after link. Anyway, I could understand if these would be previous or next models of this same manufacturer, just not mentioned yet in the text or artilerry of other manufacturers but with something especially relted to be written in the articke in the future. Article should explain all related articlery, not see also sction. In this way we could focus on making see also lists than writting articles. If 100 countries would have comparable own artillery, would you add all of them? There are lists such as List of artillery by country or more lists at List of artillery by type. Why not just them? Eurohunter (talk) 19:58, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    As far as I'm concerned it makes more sense to deal with this as is being done now. Your argument is not persuasive. Intothatdarkness 02:21, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    List of wars involving the United States

    [edit]

    List of wars involving the United States could use some attention from experience editors. Despite the accessibility concerns and lack of sources...there seems to be a little criteria for the list. Not sure how something like Operation Ocean Shield is a war. Seems to be confusion between military assistance, military interventions and military deployments etc. Moxy🍁 23:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Not sure if this is the right place to respond, but I'll do it anyway. The reason for this is because in reality it's meant to be a list of armed conflicts, not just specifically wars. Every "List of wars involving" page does it this way. Obviously the title doesn't exactly correlate to the topic, but at this point I feel like you either just have to deal with it (either way they are very simple and recognisable titles) or go out of your way to try and rename hundreds of pages like this. Setergh (talk) 12:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Setergh: @Moxy: Why do not move these articles to lists such as List of armed conflicts involving the United States? Eurohunter (talk) 20:00, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Up to you, but once again, you'd be forced to do this to hundreds of pages. You might as well just leave it, it's quite a recognisable title anyway and gets the point across. Setergh (talk) 21:20, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Polish–Ottoman War

    [edit]

    Please see Talk:Polish–Ottoman War (1620–1621)#RFC: How should the war be characterized in the infobox? WhatamIdoing (talk) 08:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    citations Q

    [edit]

    Why is orig-year being replaced by orig-date? Thanks Keith-264 (talk) 13:07, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    |orig-date= is the canonical form and |orig-year= is the alias.
    Trappist the monk (talk) 16:19, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, as far as I know, 1925 is a year not a date, hence orig-year or am I under a misapprehension? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 17:39, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    As 23 January 1925 is a date, so too is 1925; both |orig-date=23 January 1925 and |orig-date=1925 are semantically correct. The reverse is not true: 1925 is a year date, but 23 January 1925 is not a year date. |orig-date= became the canonical and preferred form because editors complained about the dissonance of |orig-year=23 January 1925.
    Trappist the monk (talk) 20:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Why not both? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't know what you mean by that question.
    Trappist the monk (talk) 14:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    List of your articles that are in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors, 2025

    [edit]

    Currently, this project has about ~673 594 545 489 articles in need of some reference cleanup. Basically, some short references created via {{sfn}} and {{harvnb}} and similar templates have missing full citations or have some other problems. This is usually caused by templates misuse or by copy-pasting a short reference from another article without adding the full reference, or because a full reference is not making use of citation templates like {{cite book}} (see Help:CS1) or {{citation}} (see Help:CS2). To easily see which citation is in need of cleanup, you can check these instructions to enable error messages (Svick's script is the simplest to use, but Trappist the monk's script is a bit more refined if you're interested in doing deeper cleanup). See also how to resolve issues.

    These could use some of your attention

    To do
    1. Baron Munchausen
    2. Battle of New Orleans
    3. Battle of Shumshu
    4. Battle of Taejon
    5. Battle of the Soyang River
    6. Battle of the Yellow Sea
    7. Benjamin Netanyahu
    8. Campaign history of the Roman military
    9. Capture of Bergamo
    10. Christiaan de Wet
    11. Classis Germanica
    12. Crusade of 1101
    13. Defense of Sihang Warehouse
    14. Donald A. Lowrie
    15. Dutch–Mataram conflicts
    16. Emir Lümanov
    17. François de Coligny
    18. French invasion of Egypt and Syria
    19. German AB-Aktion in Poland
    20. HMAS Sydney (D48)
    21. HMS Rodney (29)
    22. HMS Tuscarora
    23. Hector
    24. Ii Naomasa
    25. Karl Witzell
    26. Kashmir Civil War (1419–1420)
    27. Latin America during World War II
    28. Lebanese Forces (militia)
    29. Leopold I of Belgium
    30. Lev Mekhlis
    31. Liberation of Krujë (1443)
    32. List of Black Sea incidents involving Russia and Ukraine
    33. List of Crusades
    34. List of Ottoman grand viziers
    35. List of armed conflicts involving Poland against Ukraine
    36. List of battles between Mughals and Sikhs
    37. List of battles involving Georgia (country)
    38. List of equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
    39. List of equipment of the Australian Army
    40. List of equipment of the Syrian Army
    41. List of massacres in Kosovo
    42. List of military equipment of Turkey 1939-1945
    43. List of wars involving Latvia
    44. List of wars involving Russia
    45. List of wars involving Serbia
    46. Lithuanian Wars of Independence
    47. Louis III of France
    48. Lyndon B. Johnson
    49. M4 Sherman
    50. MG FF cannon
    51. Maki Mirage
    52. Malay–Portuguese conflicts
    53. Mallian campaign
    54. Mamluk Sultanate
    55. Maratha–Sikh clashes
    56. Marcial Barro García
    57. Margaret Thatcher
    58. Maritz rebellion
    59. Maslama ibn Abd al-Malik
    60. Materials MASINT
    61. Matilda of Tuscany
    62. Medieval Serbian noble titles
    63. Medium Mark C
    64. Miguel Enríquez's corsair fleet
    65. Mihailo Mihaljević
    66. Mikhail Semyonovich Vorontsov
    67. Military Government of the Philippine Islands
    68. Military camouflage
    69. Military deception
    70. Military history of Iraq
    71. Military history of Italy during World War II
    72. Military history of Japan
    73. Military history of Poland during World War II
    74. Military history of the Jin dynasty and the Sixteen Kingdoms
    75. Military history of the Tang dynasty
    76. Military history of the United States
    77. Military occupations by the Soviet Union
    78. Military of Champa
    79. Military of the Bruneian Sultanate
    80. Military of the Han dynasty
    81. Military of the Jin dynasty (1115–1234)
    82. Military of the Mongol Empire
    83. Military of the Warring States
    84. Military ranks of San Marino
    85. Military strategy
    86. Military stress card
    87. Military tribune
    88. Militia Ordinance
    89. Mithridates II of Parthia
    90. Mizo National Front uprising
    91. Mk 48 machine gun
    92. Mobilization of non-ferrous metals
    93. Mohammed Yakub
    94. Monarchy of Canada and the Canadian Armed Forces
    95. Monastir offensive
    96. Mongol invasions of Korea
    97. Mongol invasions of Vietnam
    98. Montevideo Naval Division
    99. Moravia–Ostrava offensive
    100. Morean War
    101. Mountain Meadows Massacre
    102. Moyuru ōzora
    103. Muircleuch Tower
    104. Mullivaikkal Hospital bombings
    105. Muscovite War of Succession
    106. Mōri Terumoto
    107. Nabatieh Fawka attack
    108. Nader Shah
    109. Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
    110. Nair Brigade
    111. Nakajima Homare
    112. Nakajima Sakae
    113. Nakazawa Koto
    114. Nardaran Fortress
    115. Narmer
    116. National Defence Commission
    117. National Resources Mobilization Act
    118. National Victory Celebration
    119. National technical means of verification
    120. Naval armour
    121. Naval history of China
    122. Naval history of Vietnam
    123. Naval organization of the U.S.-led coalition during the Gulf War
    124. Naval tactics
    125. Navy
    126. Nero
    127. New Fort York
    128. Ngāti Maru–Ngati Tūwharetoa War
    129. Nicolás de Ovando
    130. Nike Hercules
    131. Nikolaus Ritter
    132. Nine Years' War
    133. Ninja
    134. Nitto Maru (1935)
    135. Noel Malcolm
    136. Non-U.S. recipients of U.S. gallantry awards
    137. Norman Porteous
    138. North American P-51 Mustang
    139. North Russia intervention
    140. Northern Alliance
    141. Northrop A-17
    142. Northrop F-20 Tigershark
    143. Northwest Indian War
    144. Novi Sad raid
    145. Nuclear MASINT
    146. Numerus Batavorum
    147. Nuremberg Diary
    148. OTO Melara Mod 56
    149. Oberkommando der Wehrmacht
    150. Odaenathus' Sasanian Campaigns
    151. Odjak of Algiers
    152. Oflag II-D
    153. Old Lauder Castle
    154. Oleg I of Chernigov
    155. Olímpio Mourão Filho
    156. Omakaitse
    157. Operation Bajrang
    158. Operation Condor
    159. Operation Kalbajar
    160. Operation Krivaja '95
    161. Operation Long Jump
    162. Operation Outward
    163. Operation Pawan
    164. Operation Spring Awakening
    165. Opposition to United States involvement in the Vietnam War
    166. Oprichnina
    167. Opsikion
    168. Oran Division
    169. Order of Military Merit (Russia)
    170. Order of National Security Merit
    171. Ordnance QF 25-pounder
    172. Organization of the U.S. Army Air Service in 1925
    173. Origins of the Eighty Years' War
    174. Oshkosh M-ATV
    175. Ottoman Interregnum
    176. Ottoman expedition to Messina
    177. Ottoman–Bulgarian alliance
    178. Ottoman–Habsburg wars
    179. Ottoman–Venetian War (1499–1503)
    180. Outline of George Washington
    181. Pachacuti
    182. Pacification of Samar
    183. Pandyan Civil War (1169–1177)
    184. Panzer Greift An
    185. Panzerfaust 3
    186. Paraguayan Civil War (1922–1923)
    187. Paraguayan War
    188. Paraguayan War casualties
    189. Parakramabahu I
    190. Paratroopers Brigade (Brazil)
    191. Paris in World War I
    192. Passage of Humaitá
    193. Pasto Campaign
    194. Paul Revere
    195. Paul Wild (Australian scientist)
    196. Paul von Rennenkampf
    197. Paulus Mopeli Mokhachane
    198. Pedro Silva Gil
    199. Pedro de Acuña y Meneses, Marqués de Assentar
    200. Peking Field Force
    201. Penhow
    202. People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan
    203. People's Liberation Army Air Force
    204. People's Liberation Army Air Force Airborne Corps
    205. People's Volunteer Army
    206. Percentages agreement
    207. Perley P. Pitkin
    208. Perpetrator trauma
    209. Perseus (spy)
    210. Peruvian Army
    211. Peruvian Civil War of 1894–1895
    212. Peruvian resistance movement in the War of the Pacific
    213. Petar Pešić
    214. Peter II of Yugoslavia
    215. Phan Xuân Nhuận
    216. Philip V of Macedon
    217. Philippine Department
    218. Philippine–American War
    219. Piddig Church
    220. Pierre, Duke of Penthièvre
    221. Pike and shot
    222. Piri Reis
    223. Pit (nuclear weapon)
    224. Polish–Lithuanian relations during World War II
    225. Polish–Teutonic Wars
    226. Polish–Ukrainian conflict (1939–1947)
    227. Political violence in Turkey (1976–1980)
    228. Poljanak and Vukovići massacres
    229. Pontic Greek genocide
    230. Porkkala Naval Base
    231. Porolissum
    232. Port-Royal (Acadia)
    233. Portugal during World War II
    234. Portuguese Army
    235. Portuguese invasion of the Banda Oriental (1811–1812)
    236. Posadas Hospital Trial
    237. Praieira revolt
    238. Prelude to the War in Afghanistan (2001–2021)
    239. Presidency of Charles de Gaulle
    240. Prewar period (Kosovo)
    241. Pridvorica massacre
    242. Prince Władysław's March on Moscow
    243. Prince's Own Artillery Corps
    244. Prisoner of War (film)
    245. Prizren Fortress
    246. Progonos Sgouros
    247. Propaganda
    248. Protectorate General to Pacify the West
    249. Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia
    250. Province of Zara
    251. Prytanée national militaire
    252. Purge
    253. Rashidun Caliphate
    254. Reconstruction era
    255. Red Army invasion of Azerbaijan
    256. Relations between Nazi Germany and the Arab world
    257. Ridda Wars
    258. SIAI-Marchetti SF.260
    259. SM-64 Navaho
    260. SU-152G
    261. Saint Patrick's Battalion
    262. Sakakibara Yasumasa
    263. Samad bey Mehmandarov
    264. Sandile kaNgqika
    265. Sardar Chuhar Singh
    266. Sardarilal Mathradas Nanda
    267. Seabee
    268. Seaslug (missile)
    269. Second Intermedios campaign
    270. Self-Strengthening Movement
    271. Sena revolution of Bengal
    272. Shapur II's Arab campaign
    273. Shayetet 15
    274. Shell (projectile)
    275. Shimazu Yoshihiro
    276. Short Tucano
    277. Shoulder-fired missile
    278. Shuliang He
    279. Siberian intervention
    280. Sicherheitsdienst
    281. Siege of Akhalkalaki
    282. Siege of Aleppo (1124)
    283. Siege of Ani (1124)
    284. Siege of Battleford
    285. Siege of Bijapur
    286. Siege of Caizhou
    287. Siege of Constantinople (626)
    288. Siege of Coron (1685)
    289. Siege of Diu (1531)
    290. Siege of Dorpat (1558)
    291. Siege of Jülich (1621–1622)
    292. Siege of Kangra
    293. Siege of Kanie
    294. Siege of Kazan (1487)
    295. Siege of Krujë (1477–1478)
    296. Siege of Kut
    297. Siege of Lahore (1186)
    298. Siege of Lazarevsky
    299. Siege of Mouzon
    300. Siege of Nakskov
    301. Siege of Namur (1695)
    302. Siege of Nicaea (1328–1331)
    303. Siege of Odawara (1561)
    304. Siege of Osaka
    305. Siege of Paris (1435–1436)
    306. Siege of Rheinberg (1633)
    307. Siege of Riga (1621)
    308. Siege of Rogatica (1941)
    309. Siege of Sirhind
    310. Siege of Songping
    311. Siege of Taormina (962)
    312. Siege of Tyana (272)
    313. Siege of Uruguaiana
    314. Siege of Varva (1658)
    315. Siege of Vilnius (1390)
    316. Sierra Leone Civil War
    317. Sino-Dutch conflicts
    318. Sino-Indian War
    319. Sisak People's Liberation Partisan Detachment
    320. Six-Day War
    321. Sixteenth Army (Japan)
    322. Skanderbeg
    323. Skarphéðinn Njálsson
    324. Skirmishes around Vincennes (1786)
    325. Slave rebellion
    326. Slavic migrations to the Balkans
    327. Slovak National Uprising
    328. Slovak Republic (1939–1945)
    329. Small arms trade
    330. Smiling Buddha
    331. Sogdia
    332. Sohrab Khan Gorji
    333. Soldaderas
    334. Somali Armed Forces
    335. Somali National Army
    336. Somaliland War of Independence
    337. Somali–Portuguese conflicts
    338. Sortition Law
    339. Souliotes
    340. South Sudanese Civil War
    341. Southeast Asia Treaty Organization
    342. Southern Tang campaign against Chu
    343. Southern Tang conquest of Min
    344. Soviet Air Forces
    345. Soviet Armed Forces
    346. Soviet Army
    347. Soviet Baltic Sea campaign in 1945
    348. Soviet Union in World War II
    349. Spain during World War I
    350. Spanish Armed Forces
    351. Spanish colonization of the Americas
    352. Spanish occupation of Tangier (1940–1945)
    353. Special international tribunal for the crime of aggression (Russian invasion of Ukraine)
    354. Spelling alphabet
    355. Stefan Nemanja
    356. Stingray light tank
    357. Strada delle 52 Gallerie
    358. Stratagem of Peshawar
    359. Structural history of the Roman military
    360. Sub-lieutenant
    361. Submarine (Clancy book)
    362. Sudetendeutsches Freikorps
    363. Sumdorong Chu standoff
    364. Suqour al-Sham Brigades
    365. Sussex Yeomanry
    366. Sutton Hoo helmet
    367. Sveneld
    368. Swedish–Tripolitanian war (1796–1802)
    369. Sykes–Picot Agreement
    370. Syrian Arab Armed Forces
    371. Syrian Hezbollah
    372. Syrian civil war
    373. São Paulo Revolt of 1924
    374. São Paulo Revolt of 1924 in the interior
    375. Sébastien Le Prestre, Marquis of Vauban
    376. T29 heavy tank
    377. T30 heavy tank
    378. T92 light tank
    379. Tachibana Dōsetsu
    380. Tachibana Muneshige
    381. Takeda Shingen
    382. Talaat Pasha
    383. Tambov Rebellion
    384. Tanker war
    385. Tanks in the German Army
    386. Tanks in the Japanese Army
    387. Teragaki Izō
    388. Tercio
    389. Territorial Force Imperial Service Badge
    390. Territory of the Islamic State
    391. Terrorism in Lebanon
    392. The Souldiers Pocket Bible
    393. Third Battle of Panipat
    394. Thomas de Mowbray, 1st Duke of Norfolk
    395. Tigranes the Great
    396. Timeline of the Croat–Bosniak War
    397. Timm N2T Tutor
    398. Tirailleurs indochinois
    399. Tokugawa Ieyasu
    400. Torsion mangonel myth
    401. Toyotomi Hideyoshi
    402. Transition from Ming to Qing
    403. Transportkorps Speer
    404. Trial by combat
    405. Tripartite Struggle
    406. Trix Terwindt
    407. Trần dynasty military tactics and organization
    408. Tunisian campaign
    409. Turkish invasion of Cyprus
    410. Turkmen Ground Forces
    411. Tōdō Takatora
    412. U.S. Air Force aeronautical rating
    413. UR-100N
    414. Ubayd Allah ibn Ziyad
    415. Uesugi Kenshin
    416. Ukrainian Insurgent Army
    417. Ukrainian People's Revolutionary Army
    418. Uldin
    419. Umar ibn Ubayd Allah ibn Ma'mar
    420. Uniforms and insignia of the Red Army (1917–1924)
    421. United Armed Forces of the Commonwealth of Independent States
    422. United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda
    423. United Provinces of the Río de la Plata
    424. United States Army Air Forces
    425. United States Army Central
    426. United States Army Forces Command
    427. United States Army deception formations of World War II
    428. United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
    429. United States Military Academy
    430. United States S-class submarine
    431. United States Strategic Bombing Survey
    432. United States and state-sponsored terrorism
    433. United States in World War I
    434. United States military and prostitution in South Korea
    435. United States news media and the Vietnam War
    436. United States war crimes
    437. Uprising in Serbia (1941)
    438. Uprising in Vučitrn
    439. Uprising in the Ural and Turgai Oblasts
    440. Uralmash
    441. Uralvagonzavod
    442. Urban combat in the São Paulo Revolt of 1924
    443. Uroš Tešanović
    444. Urus Khan
    445. Ustaše Youth
    446. Uzdol massacre
    447. VC-137C SAM 26000
    448. VI Corps (United States)
    449. Valencian Canton
    450. Valens
    451. Vandal War (461–468)
    452. Vasić M12
    453. Venetian Crusade
    454. Venetian expedition to the Levant (1099–1100)
    455. Veselin Misita
    456. Vijayanagara military
    457. Viking Age arms and armour
    458. Viking Age in Estonia
    459. Vimaladharmasuriya I
    460. Violent non-state actor
    461. Vought F4U Corsair
    462. Vuk Mandušić
    463. Waldemar Erfurth
    464. War in Afghanistan (2001–2021)
    465. War of Radagaisus
    466. War of succession
    467. War of the Galician Succession (1205–1245)
    468. War of the Third Coalition
    469. Warriors of Christ the King
    470. Wartime sexual violence
    471. Weapon System
    472. Weapons of the Vietnam War
    473. Weather events during wars
    474. Wehib Pasha
    475. Wehrmachthelferin
    476. Wei Yan
    477. Werner Milch
    478. Western Fleet (India)
    479. Western Sahara War
    480. Westminster Dragoons
    481. White Sands Launch Complex 38
    482. White movement
    483. Willy Herteleer
    484. Women in ancient warfare
    485. World War II in Yugoslav Macedonia
    486. Władysław III of Poland
    487. Władysław Wiecierzyński
    488. Yazid I
    489. Élysée Accords

    If you could add the full references to those article/fix the problem references, that would be great. Again, the easiest way to deal with those is to install Svick's script per these instructions. If after installing the script, you do not see an error, that means it was either taken care of, or was a false positive, and you don't need to do anything else. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:47, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Updated list, 595 articles remain. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Updated list, 554 articles remain. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Updated list, 489 articles remain. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    FWIW my experience with these has been that they tend to be the following issues with the following solutions:

    • Sfn was copypasted from somewhere else, has no original cite. Solution: replace with either a new reference or {{cn}} tags.
    • Sfn has a typo in the name and doesn't match the cite. Solution: Fix the typo.
    • Sfn has an incorrect year and doesn't match the cite. Solution: Fix the typo if it's an error, add a new reference or {{cn}} tags if the Sfn is to a work missing an original cite. SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 05:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    In my experience, about 20-25% of the time, the short footnote is copied from another, related article, without the full citation being brought over. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:11, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    This page hasn't been updated or properly sourced in 15 years. Please, rescue it or go to WP:AfD. 2025 is a year of decisive action. Bearian (talk) 06:50, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Another military article unsourced 15 years. Time for us to decide what to do: add sources or discuss deleting it. Bearian (talk) 17:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Can you review it?

    [edit]

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Battle_of_Rey_(1059)# Kartal1071 (talk) 14:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    You are more likely to get a review of a draft article (especially as you are a relatively new user) at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Since this is a new request, I suggest that this request not be removed for several days, at least, to see if any experienced editor who regularly reads this page nonetheless is willing to review it. Donner60 (talk) 06:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you Kartal1071 (talk) 18:11, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2025 Potomac River mid-air collision#Requested move 30 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 06:16, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2025 Potomac River mid-air collision#Requested move 30 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 16:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]