Talk:Mount Apo

Volcanoes High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines High‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Mountains Top‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Southeast Asia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Apo Trek

If the summit is "very easy to reach", why wasn't it climbed until 1880? Coffee 16:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No offense but you are asking the wrong question. Back in the 1800's when the trails are not yet established, you have to climb and hack from the base of the mountain all the way to the summit. The first climbers took weeks (if im not mistaken) to reach the summit and back.

Right now, there are roads and well established trails, and the jump off point on the way to the summit is at a higher elevation. The degree of difficulty on reaching the summit varies. Yes it is true that the summit is easy to reach if you take the Kidapawan trail via North Cotabato (one day up, one day down). On the other hand, the Kapatagan Trail via Davao del Sur is much more challenging (2 days up, one day down) compared to the North Cotabato approach. I summited Apo on 2006 via a new trail named Sibulan. I should say that this is my most challenging climb so far (3 days up, 2 days down).

Regular hikes and exploration climbs are two different things. Even a hill will take days to explore if you do not have established trails.

I hope this answers your question. If not, try climbing a mountain yourself. I'm quite sure you will eventually know what I mean. :)

--Gilgal1 (talk) 17:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Layout

The intro section of article "Mount Apo" has {{Infobox mountain}}, and the altitude is specified 3x times (as 2954 m) to help detect hacking of the mountain's height.

Official height: 2954 m (source Britannica: EB-565).

Beware: over 90% of edits to article "Mount Apo" are vandalism+reverts, as typical of many other unprotected articles about a "big" topic. The altitude has been hacked (from 2954 m), numerous times, to erroneously state: 3142, 3145, 3224 m, etc.

This article is a good candidate for becoming a verified-edit article, rather than being a general article which instantly displays new changes & hacked text. -Wikid77 (talk) 23:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with the above. No sources in support of anything higher than 2954 have been supplied. Please stop making unsourced changes to this elevation. Viewfinder (talk) 10:44, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The unregistered IP's who are making these changes appear to be being operated by the same editor. Viewfinder (talk) 10:47, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The information on the height of Mt Apo is still erroneous given at the very top of the article more than 10,000ft. No mountain in the PH has reached higher than 10,000ft. Lctatingjr (talk) 02:28, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 April 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change, “master” or “grandfather” to "grandchild" because "apo" means grandchild not grandfather in Tagolog. If you were meaning a different Filipino language then you should specify because it confused me. I am half Filipino and know only a few words but that is one that I know. 71.204.17.174 (talk) 23:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Sam Sailor ^Sing 20:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Apo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]